This is the mail archive of the
gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GCC project.
Re: Testsuite patch for PR fortran/16511
- From: Steve Kargl <sgk at troutmask dot apl dot washington dot edu>
- To: "Billinghurst, David (CALCRTS)" <david dot billinghurst at comalco dot riotinto dot com dot au>
- Cc: gcc-patches at gcc dot gnu dot org, fortran at gcc dot gnu dot org
- Date: Wed, 14 Jul 2004 05:49:29 -0700
- Subject: Re: Testsuite patch for PR fortran/16511
- References: <8ED2FA87C8ACC04192709688DDFD5F5F09B367@calttsv025.cal.riotinto.org>
On Wed, Jul 14, 2004 at 05:25:08PM +1000, Billinghurst, David (CALCRTS) wrote:
> From: Steve Kargl
> >
> > On Wed, Jul 14, 2004 at 01:52:36PM +1000, Billinghurst, David
> > (CALCRTS) wrote:
> > > I now think the current gfortran behaviour is standard conforming.
> >
> > Are you sure? NAG's Fortran 95 compiles this code
> > without issuing an error.
> >
> > kargl[207] f95 -c -C=all 19990905-0.f
> > Obsolescent: 19990905-0.f, line 2: Fixed source form
> >
> > I'll post a message to c.l.f.
>
> I am not sure. It is a nasty little corner case.
> The Fortran 77 standard seems clear, but ...
>
I started a c.l.f thread. From the responses that I have received
so far, the code appears to be conforming to F90 and beyond. But,
the heavy weight experts have not respondent, yet.
--
Steve