This is the mail archive of the
mailing list for the GCC project.
Re: [PATCH] DWARF-2 unwinder off-by-one problem with signal frames
- From: Ulrich Weigand <weigand at i1 dot informatik dot uni-erlangen dot de>
- To: rth at redhat dot com (Richard Henderson)
- Cc: weigand at i1 dot informatik dot uni-erlangen dot de (Ulrich Weigand), gcc-patches at gcc dot gnu dot org
- Date: Thu, 1 Jul 2004 00:13:13 +0200 (CEST)
- Subject: Re: [PATCH] DWARF-2 unwinder off-by-one problem with signal frames
Richard Henderson wrote:
> At present the fix is to not do *anything* different in the unwinder.
This is unfortunate, in particular as we now rely on the unwinder
even to produce stack backtraces (which should most especially work
from within a SIGSEGV handler ...).
> It's the responsibility of the signal handler to distinguish between
> the case of a signal that points to the beginning of the trapping
> insn (SEGV), and one that points to the end (FPE). See all the
> frobbing that goes on in libjava to handle these cases.
> I'll admit that it would be more ideal for the user if this were
> all done automatically, but given the amount of variance in behaviour
> of signals on different platforms, I don't know how to do this.
This will certainly have to be handled in platform specific code.
However, if we assume that the platform *has* the information
required to decide whether the RA points to the begin or end of
the trapping insn, one possible implementation would be a new
flag in _Unwind_FrameState that MD_FALLBACK_FRAME_STATE_FOR
could set to indicate the former case. Common unwind-dw.c code
would then simply need to consider that flag.
(In the case of RT signals, where the signal number is actually
stored as part of the siginfo_t on the stack, most platforms
should be able to make that decision correctly. For non-RT
signal frames it gets more difficult, of course.)
Should I go ahead and try to implement a solution along these lines?
Dr. Ulrich Weigand