This is the mail archive of the
mailing list for the GCC project.
Re: LSB patch to gcc 3.3 tree
You Wrote Michael Matz
> Hi again,
> On Tue, 29 Jun 2004, Michael Matz wrote:
>> > >> + _ZNSt23__codecvt_abstract_base*;
>> > >> +
>> > >> } GLIBCPP_3.2.3;
>> > This should be in a new section, GLIBCPP_3.2.5
>> > Please just use the 3.4. style instead of these blanket exports.
> Hmm, now looking at 3.4 and head. Both contain:
> # std::__codecvt_abstract_base*
> I.e. first it's also a glob (in difference to for instance the typeinfo
> struct for this class), and second it's wrong. Namely the '_ZNStSt23...'
> contains 'St' twice where the symbols are named '_ZNSt23...' .
> So, question is, is >=3.4 indeed broken, and can I nevertheless use those
> globs for std::__codecvt_abstract_base members?
Yes. See Benjmain's message