This is the mail archive of the
gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GCC project.
Patch for typo in c99status.html
- From: "Joseph S. Myers" <jsm at polyomino dot org dot uk>
- To: gcc-patches at gcc dot gnu dot org
- Date: Tue, 29 Jun 2004 19:57:17 +0000 (UTC)
- Subject: Patch for typo in c99status.html
This patch fixes a typo that has been in c99status.html since probable
origin in <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2000-07/msg00471.html>.
(IEEE 751 relates to Wood Transmission Structures, IEEE 754 to Binary
Floating-Point Arithmetic.)
--
Joseph S. Myers http://www.srcf.ucam.org/~jsm28/gcc/
jsm@polyomino.org.uk (personal mail)
jsm28@gcc.gnu.org (Bugzilla assignments and CCs)
Index: c99status.html
===================================================================
RCS file: /cvs/gcc/wwwdocs/htdocs/c99status.html,v
retrieving revision 1.38
diff -u -r1.38 c99status.html
--- c99status.html 11 Apr 2004 17:23:17 -0000 1.38
+++ c99status.html 29 Jun 2004 19:53:36 -0000
@@ -301,7 +301,7 @@
<li>cpp has limited support for multibyte character sets.</li>
-<li>IEC 60559 is IEEE 751 floating point. This works if and only if
+<li>IEC 60559 is IEEE 754 floating point. This works if and only if
the hardware is perfectly compliant, but GCC does not define
<code>__STDC_IEC_559__</code> or implement the associated standard
pragmas.</li>
Index: gcc-3.0/c99status.html
===================================================================
RCS file: /cvs/gcc/wwwdocs/htdocs/gcc-3.0/c99status.html,v
retrieving revision 1.5
diff -u -r1.5 c99status.html
--- gcc-3.0/c99status.html 21 May 2003 18:00:36 -0000 1.5
+++ gcc-3.0/c99status.html 29 Jun 2004 19:53:36 -0000
@@ -299,7 +299,7 @@
<li>cpp arithmetic is done in <code>HOST_WIDEST_INT</code>, which may not
be the same as the target <code>intmax_t</code> required by C99.</li>
-<li>IEC 60559 is IEEE 751 floating point. This works if and only if
+<li>IEC 60559 is IEEE 754 floating point. This works if and only if
the hardware is perfectly compliant, but GCC does not define
<code>__STDC_IEC_559__</code> or implement the associated standard
pragmas.</li>
Index: gcc-3.1/c99status.html
===================================================================
RCS file: /cvs/gcc/wwwdocs/htdocs/gcc-3.1/c99status.html,v
retrieving revision 1.4
diff -u -r1.4 c99status.html
--- gcc-3.1/c99status.html 21 Jul 2002 20:40:58 -0000 1.4
+++ gcc-3.1/c99status.html 29 Jun 2004 19:53:36 -0000
@@ -300,7 +300,7 @@
<li>cpp arithmetic is done in <code>HOST_WIDEST_INT</code>, which may not
be the same as the target <code>intmax_t</code> required by C99.</li>
-<li>IEC 60559 is IEEE 751 floating point. This works if and only if
+<li>IEC 60559 is IEEE 754 floating point. This works if and only if
the hardware is perfectly compliant, but GCC does not define
<code>__STDC_IEC_559__</code> or implement the associated standard
pragmas.</li>
Index: gcc-3.3/c99status.html
===================================================================
RCS file: /cvs/gcc/wwwdocs/htdocs/gcc-3.3/c99status.html,v
retrieving revision 1.3
diff -u -r1.3 c99status.html
--- gcc-3.3/c99status.html 11 Apr 2004 17:23:56 -0000 1.3
+++ gcc-3.3/c99status.html 29 Jun 2004 19:53:36 -0000
@@ -297,7 +297,7 @@
<li>cpp has limited support for multibyte character sets.</li>
-<li>IEC 60559 is IEEE 751 floating point. This works if and only if
+<li>IEC 60559 is IEEE 754 floating point. This works if and only if
the hardware is perfectly compliant, but GCC does not define
<code>__STDC_IEC_559__</code> or implement the associated standard
pragmas.</li>
Index: gcc-3.4/c99status.html
===================================================================
RCS file: /cvs/gcc/wwwdocs/htdocs/gcc-3.4/c99status.html,v
retrieving revision 1.2
diff -u -r1.2 c99status.html
--- gcc-3.4/c99status.html 11 Apr 2004 17:23:56 -0000 1.2
+++ gcc-3.4/c99status.html 29 Jun 2004 19:53:36 -0000
@@ -297,7 +297,7 @@
<li>cpp has limited support for multibyte character sets.</li>
-<li>IEC 60559 is IEEE 751 floating point. This works if and only if
+<li>IEC 60559 is IEEE 754 floating point. This works if and only if
the hardware is perfectly compliant, but GCC does not define
<code>__STDC_IEC_559__</code> or implement the associated standard
pragmas.</li>