This is the mail archive of the gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.
Index Nav: | [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index] | |
---|---|---|
Message Nav: | [Date Prev] [Date Next] | [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] |
Other format: | [Raw text] |
Hi, I'll shortly need a TREE_NOT_CHECK macro, and in implementing it, noticed that the various tree_check_failed routines could be commonized by using varidic functions. The tree code zero use ERROR_MARK, so I can't see it being tested explicitly for, hence it should be ok for the sentinel value -- I could use an initial count if we want to be paranoid.
I tested the failure routine by forcing a checking failure.
built & tested all languages on i686-pc-linux-gnu, ok?
-- Mark Mitchell CodeSourcery, LLC (916) 791-8304 mark@codesourcery.com
Index Nav: | [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index] | |
---|---|---|
Message Nav: | [Date Prev] [Date Next] | [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] |