This is the mail archive of the gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: RFA: cfg.texi patch

From: Gerald Pfeifer <gerald at pfeifer dot com>
To: Ben Elliston <bje at au1 dot ibm dot com>
Cc: Diego Novillo <dnovillo at redhat dot com>, gcc-patches at gcc dot gnu dot org
Date: Sun, 27 Jun 2004 01:05:28 +0200 (CEST)
Subject: Re: RFA: cfg.texi patch
References: <87k6xxi2zk.fsf@au.ibm.com> <1088087130.4741.39.camel@localhost.localdomain><877jtw7a5t.fsf@au.ibm.com>

On Fri, 25 Jun 2004, Ben Elliston wrote:
>> How about "Given two basic blocks A and B, block A dominates block B
>> if A is @emph{always} executed before B." ?
> Good idea.  I made that change.  Doc maintainers: okay to commit?

Sure.  You actually don't need a doc maintainer, when some maintainer
for the code in question is fine with such a doc change. :-)

Gerald

References:
- RFA: cfg.texi patch
  - From: Ben Elliston
- Re: RFA: cfg.texi patch
  - From: Diego Novillo
- Re: RFA: cfg.texi patch
  - From: Ben Elliston

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]