This is the mail archive of the
mailing list for the GCC project.
Re: [RFC] Fixes to bootstrap from a C++ compiler (part 1)
> Well, how do people feel about this? Is it good to rely on C's implicit
> conversion between "void *" and other pointer types, or is OK to insert
> casts necessary to satisfy the more restrictive C++ rule (where pointer
> types implicitly convert to "void*" or not vice versa)?
First of all, we should not be manipulating that many void* in the
first place -- if we do, that means we have serious abstraction
problem we should fix. Second, I believe we should insert the
appropriate cast even if we know that it is unnecessary by
> (Personally, I've always viewed the implicit conversion from "void *" to
> other pointer types in C a bug in the type system and I try to avoid
> relying on it.)
I'm on the same page as you. It is a hole in the type system
the C committee introduced for I don't know exactly why. I see
the implicit conversion void* -> T* a highly spurious programming
style. I would definitely recommend against it.