This is the mail archive of the
mailing list for the GCC project.
Re: [patch] Statement operand iterators
Zdenek Dvorak <firstname.lastname@example.org> writes:
>> Odd. Could you please compare generated code with your first and
>> second patch and figure out why the first patch is worse?
> with the second patch, all the switch statements are eliminated in
> compile time (since we create separate copy of the code for each type
> of operands).
Unless I miss my guess, that should happen with the inline function too?