This is the mail archive of the
mailing list for the GCC project.
Re: [RFC] Fixes to bootstrap from a C++ compiler (part 1)
Bernardo Innocenti wrote:
On Friday 25 June 2004 07:09, Richard Kenner wrote:The revised patch is OK, so long as you test it. I agree that these
changes actually make the code better, even in C; the C pointer-casting
sloppiness was a deliberate concession to existing practice, not a feature.
You are missing numerous blanks.
+ struct md_constant *def = (struct md_constant *)*slot;
Such as after the ")" here and in many similar places.
I've just finished fixing these...
Further similar patches are pre-approved, so long as you test them as
well and so long as your are not making structural changes. We should
not expect that other people will necessarily refrain from checking in
things that break the copmilation with C++, or blame them for doing
that; it's not (yet?) part of our requirements that people worry about that.
Gaby will be disappointed in me, since I opposed his attempt at doing
something similar a while back. It's not that I like you better; it's
just that I think I made a mistake then.