This is the mail archive of the
gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GCC project.
Re: Patch to allow Ada to work with tree-ssa
- From: Andrew Pinski <pinskia at physics dot uc dot edu>
- To: dnovillo at redhat dot com (Diego Novillo)
- Cc: laurent at guerby dot net (Laurent GUERBY), rearnsha at gcc dot gnu dot org (Richard Earnshaw), jsm at polyomino dot org dot uk (Joseph S. Myers), geoffk at geoffk dot org (Geoff Keating), kenner at vlsi1 dot ultra dot nyu dot edu (Richard Kenner), gcc-patches at gcc dot gnu dot org (gcc-patches at gcc dot gnu dot org)
- Date: Thu, 24 Jun 2004 15:03:43 -0400 (EDT)
- Subject: Re: Patch to allow Ada to work with tree-ssa
>
> On Thu, 2004-06-24 at 14:46, Laurent GUERBY wrote:
>
> > It would be more interesting to have a fixed piece of code compile time,
> > like a stable release with some tools, daily CVS bootstrap time is a
> > poor indicator of compile time speed, it can vary greatly for
> > reasons unrelated to pure compile speed.
> >
> We do: SPEC.
>
> http://people.redhat.com/dnovillo/spec2000/gcc/global-build-secs_elapsed.html
> http://people.redhat.com/dnovillo/spec95/gcc/global-build-secs_elapsed.html
Or even better look at the individual build time for the SPEC benchmarks:
<http://people.redhat.com/dnovillo/spec2000/gcc/individual-build-secs_elapsed.html>
You will see that VPR and GCC compile time increased after the patch went in.
Another good site is the one for POOMA, C++ code:
<http://www.tat.physik.uni-tuebingen.de/~rguenth/gcc/monitor-summary.html>
You will see that compile time went up there too with no increase in preformance at all.
Andrew