This is the mail archive of the
gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GCC project.
Re: [arm] ARM_LEGITIMIZE_RELOAD_ADDRESS vs soft-float
- From: Richard Earnshaw <rearnsha at gcc dot gnu dot org>
- To: Paul Brook <paul at codesourcery dot com>
- Cc: "gcc-patches at gcc dot gnu dot org" <gcc-patches at gcc dot gnu dot org>
- Date: Mon, 21 Jun 2004 10:29:28 +0100
- Subject: Re: [arm] ARM_LEGITIMIZE_RELOAD_ADDRESS vs soft-float
- Organization: GNU
- References: <200406191401.34459.paul@codesourcery.com>
On Sat, 2004-06-19 at 14:01, Paul Brook wrote:
> ARM_LEGITIMIZE_RELOAD_ADDRESS currently tests
> (TARGET_SOFT_FLOAT && TARGET_FPA)
> I see not reason why soft-float behaviour should depend on the format used.
> This is probably a hangover from when TARGET_SOFT_FLOAT implied TARGET_FPA.
> Patch below remove the check for FPA.
>
> Tested with cross to arm-none-elf.
> Ok?
>
> Paul
>
> 2004-06-19 Paul Brook <paul@codesourcery.com>
>
> * config/arm/arm.h (ARM_LEGITIMIZE_RELOAD_ADDRESS): Soft-float need
> not imply FPA.
OK