This is the mail archive of the
mailing list for the GCC project.
Re: PATCH: PR c++/9844, c++/13989 fix
On 18 Jun 2004, at 22.38, Jason Merrill wrote:
Why is it necessary to handle attribs for member function declarations
grokfndecl rather than start_function and grokfield as we have been
How was that broken?
It was broken in the case when an inline member function declaration
was followed by
an out-of-line definition. Compile attrib16.C and attrib18.C with the
current TOT and you will see.