This is the mail archive of the gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: [gfortran] PATCH -- random.c: fix infinite loop and make sequences consistent

From: Steve Kargl <sgk at troutmask dot apl dot washington dot edu>
To: Tobias Schl?ter <tobias dot schlueter at physik dot uni-muenchen dot de>
Cc: kargls at comcast dot net, fortran at gcc dot gnu dot org, gcc-patches at gcc dot gnu dot org
Date: Sun, 13 Jun 2004 11:19:07 -0700
Subject: Re: [gfortran] PATCH -- random.c: fix infinite loop and make sequences consistent
References: <20040613101605.764109fa.kargls@comcast.net> <40CC9427.5070503@physik.uni-muenchen.de> <40CC998E.5030009@physik.uni-muenchen.de>

On Sun, Jun 13, 2004 at 08:14:38PM +0200, Tobias Schl?ter wrote:
> Tobias Schl?ter wrote:
> >Steven G. Kargl wrote:
> >
> >>2004-06-13  Steven G. Kargl  <kargls@comcast.net>
> >>     * random.c (random_r4): Burn a random number
> >>       (random_r8): fix infinite loop.
> >>
> >
> >I committed this under the obviously correct rule. 
> 
> Actually, I take the word 'obviously' back. Shouldn't the check compare 
> to 1.0 given that our random numbers are meant to be in the interval [0,1(?
> 

Whoops. I sent the wrong patch.  Yes, it should be (x==1.0).

-- 
Steve

Follow-Ups:
- Re: [gfortran] PATCH -- random.c: fix infinite loop and make sequencesconsistent
  - From: Tobias Schlüter

References:
- [gfortran] PATCH -- random.c: fix infinite loop and make sequencesconsistent
  - From: Steven G. Kargl
- Re: [gfortran] PATCH -- random.c: fix infinite loop and make sequencesconsistent
  - From: Tobias Schlüter
- Re: [gfortran] PATCH -- random.c: fix infinite loop and make sequencesconsistent
  - From: Tobias Schlüter

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]