This is the mail archive of the gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: [PATCH]: Fix 930523-1 regression caused by extra checking

From: Daniel Berlin <dberlin at dberlin dot org>
To: Diego Novillo <dnovillo at redhat dot com>
Cc: GCC Patches <gcc-patches at gcc dot gnu dot org>
Date: Fri, 11 Jun 2004 12:01:51 -0400
Subject: Re: [PATCH]: Fix 930523-1 regression caused by extra checking
References: <D24F580B-BBBD-11D8-94BB-000A95DA505C@dberlin.org> <1086969399.22854.375.camel@localhost.localdomain>

On Jun 11, 2004, at 11:56 AM, Diego Novillo wrote:

On Fri, 2004-06-11 at 11:41, Daniel Berlin wrote:
It would be nice to push this flag setting/unsetting into remove_v_*
and append_v_* and then make sure everything simply goes through the
interface.
Yes, why doesn't your patch do that?

Oh, i'm working on a patch to do that, i just wanted to fix the regression in the meantime. If nobody cares about the new test failure, i'll happily withdraw the current patch until the new one is ready. --Dan

References:
- [PATCH]: Fix 930523-1 regression caused by extra checking
  - From: Daniel Berlin
- Re: [PATCH]: Fix 930523-1 regression caused by extra checking
  - From: Diego Novillo

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]