This is the mail archive of the gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: POT file for cpplib

From: "Martin v. Löwis" <martin at v dot loewis dot de>
To: "Joseph S. Myers" <jsm at polyomino dot org dot uk>
Cc: Karl Eichwalder <ke at gnu dot franken dot de>, Paolo Bonzini <bonzini at gnu dot org>, gcc-patches at gcc dot gnu dot org, tp - Translation Project <translation at iro dot umontreal dot ca>
Date: Fri, 11 Jun 2004 07:17:21 +0200
Subject: Re: POT file for cpplib
References: <40BDA400.1000508@gnu.org> <40C6D071.5050009@gnu.org> <shekop80xy.fsf@frechet.suse.de> <shk6ygk4pq.fsf@tux.gnu.franken.de> <Pine.LNX.4.58.0406100101480.1266@digraph.polyomino.org.uk> <shy8mwhx5r.fsf@tux.gnu.franken.de> <Pine.LNX.4.58.0406100811001.3432@digraph.polyomino.org.uk>

Joseph S. Myers wrote:

The cpplib messages will continue to be in gcc.pot on the 3.4 branch, with
no separate cpplib domain.  The concern is that the future work of
translators on those messages in gcc.pot gets transferred to their
cpplib.pot translations when 3.5 branches (quite likely not for six months
or more yet).

Please have a look at

http://www.iro.umontreal.ca/translation/HTML/domain-cpplib.html

I just added a comment saying that translators should use the gcc
catalog as a starting point. It also seems that Karl already arranged
to initialize the cpplib domain with translations with the gcc
translations. Does that resolve your concerns?

Regards,
Martin

Follow-Ups:
- Re: POT file for cpplib
  - From: Joseph S. Myers

References:
- Re: POT file for cpplib
  - From: Karl Eichwalder
- Re: POT file for cpplib
  - From: Joseph S. Myers
- Re: POT file for cpplib
  - From: Karl Eichwalder
- Re: POT file for cpplib
  - From: Joseph S. Myers

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]