This is the mail archive of the
gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GCC project.
Re: POT file for cpplib
- From: "Joseph S. Myers" <jsm at polyomino dot org dot uk>
- To: Karl Eichwalder <ke at gnu dot franken dot de>
- Cc: Paolo Bonzini <bonzini at gnu dot org>, gcc-patches at gcc dot gnu dot org, tp - Translation Project <translation at iro dot umontreal dot ca>
- Date: Thu, 10 Jun 2004 01:06:58 +0000 (UTC)
- Subject: Re: POT file for cpplib
- References: <40BDA400.1000508@gnu.org> <40C6D071.5050009@gnu.org><shekop80xy.fsf@frechet.suse.de> <shk6ygk4pq.fsf@tux.gnu.franken.de>
On Wed, 9 Jun 2004, Karl Eichwalder wrote:
> I decided to install it as 3.5.0-b20040609; thus it matches the gcc
> style. here is the initial registry record:
Whose responsibility is it to merge new translations of cpplib messages in
gcc-3.4.x.pot (as translators will continue working on 3.4 branch gcc.pot
for many months until 3.5 branches) into the cpplib domain? I.e., will
the gcc.pot translations be used to initialize those for cpplib.pot when
3.5 branches, or will translators be expected to merge changes to cpplib
translations from gcc.pot into cpplib.pot themselves (and be told so)?
When a new version is to be submitted to the TP (when 3.5 branches), does
sending once the URL of a snapshot containing both gcc.pot and cpplib.pot
suffice, or do the instructions at <http://gcc.gnu.org/translation.html>
need changing to indicate that the same URL should be sent twice with two
different subjects?
--
Joseph S. Myers
jsm@polyomino.org.uk