This is the mail archive of the gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: Unreviewed patches

From: Eric Botcazou <ebotcazou at libertysurf dot fr>
To: Roger Sayle <roger at eyesopen dot com>
Cc: gcc-patches at gcc dot gnu dot org
Date: Tue, 1 Jun 2004 09:07:31 +0200
Subject: Re: Unreviewed patches
References: <Pine.LNX.4.44.0405311951160.10926-100000@www.eyesopen.com>

> Are these ACATS failures 3.4.x regressions?  If so, you might
> want to ask Mark about backporting these patches for gcc 3.4.1
> after they've been on mainline for a few days without problems.

No, I don't think they qualify as regressions.  And don't count on me to put 
a reload patch on a release branch! :-)

Thanks for this review and your time.

-- 
Eric Botcazou

References:
- Re: Unreviewed patches
  - From: Roger Sayle

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]