This is the mail archive of the
mailing list for the GCC project.
Re: [PATCH] Define __NO_MATH_INLINES and __NO_STRING_INLINES
Jakub Jelinek wrote:
One can grab the changes from CVS. How is that different from GCC?Sorry, Jakub and to everyone: this is quickly becoming off-topic.
glibc 2.3.3 has been released and there is no such thing as glibc 2.3.3
branch, only HEAD.
You must admit that "glibc 2.3.3 has been released" sounds a little weird
without tarballs in the 'Release' dir and without a branch. All of this *is*
different, very different, from GCC.
Of course, we all use CVS (personally, I'm currently using a glibc-cvs a
of months old) but, perhaps I'm being naive, I like official releases, which
"sounds more trustworthy": f.i., can't happen that a casual patch (like
yours for string2.h? ;) breaks things from one day to another...