This is the mail archive of the gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: Configure problem

From: Daniel Jacobowitz <drow at false dot org>
To: Arnaud Charlet <charlet at ACT-Europe dot FR>
Cc: Andrew Pinski <pinskia at physics dot uc dot edu>, DJ Delorie <dj at redhat dot com>,gcc-patches at gcc dot gnu dot org, n dot pero at mi dot flashnet dot it
Date: Fri, 21 May 2004 11:09:52 -0400
Subject: Re: Configure problem
References: <20040520204634.GA12867@nevyn.them.org> <200405202133.i4KLX7c01439@tin.geop.uc.edu> <20040521085257.A3598@dublin.act-europe.fr>

On Fri, May 21, 2004 at 08:52:57AM +0200, Arnaud Charlet wrote:
> > > Libobjc and Ada maintainers, are the libobjc and libada bits of this
> > > patch OK?  The original patch is at:
> > >   http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2004-05/msg01197.html
> 
> Well it's hard to say without doing any actual testing.
> At least a build with Ada (e.g. with pre-ssa-merge tag) and this patch would
> be needed.

I think you will need to come up with a better solution for this sort
of problem, if it's going to be a while before Ada is fixed in HEAD.
I backported the patch.  It didn't apply cleanly, but in this case it
only took ten minutes to fix it up, so I did.  As time goes by this is
going to become more and more of a burden, and the testing will be less
representative.

Libada built OK with the patch.  OK?

-- 
Daniel Jacobowitz

Follow-Ups:
- Re: Configure problem
  - From: Arnaud Charlet

References:
- Re: Configure problem
  - From: Daniel Jacobowitz
- Re: Configure problem
  - From: Andrew Pinski
- Re: Configure problem
  - From: Arnaud Charlet

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]