This is the mail archive of the
mailing list for the GCC project.
Re: Configure problem
On Tue, 2004-05-18 at 20:34, Daniel Jacobowitz wrote:
> Which patch? I thought you were referring to the LDFLAGS patch, which
> was checked in, so I didn't go looking for another.
Yes, I was referring to the LDFLAGS patch.
> That gets us back into the "what do all these arguments mean" dance
> with autoconf. Current best practice appears to be to not use the
> --target when not absolutely necessary.
Right, I forgot about that problem.
Jim Wilson, GNU Tools Support, http://www.SpecifixInc.com