This is the mail archive of the
gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GCC project.
Re: [v3] libstdc++/12854
Benjamin Kosnik <bkoz@redhat.com> writes:
> >Why doesn't
> >
> >#pragma GCC system_header
> >
> >address this issue?
>
> what do you mean? Why does -Weffc++ appear to ignore this pragma?
No - I meant the opposite. I'm sorry I was unclear. This:
// C
#include <cassert>
#include <cctype>
#include <cerrno>
#include <cfloat>
#include <ciso646>
#include <climits>
#include <clocale>
#include <cmath>
#include <csetjmp>
#include <csignal>
#include <cstdarg>
#include <cstddef>
#include <cstdio>
#include <cstdlib>
#include <cstring>
#include <ctime>
// C++
#include <algorithm>
#include <bitset>
#include <complex>
#include <deque>
#include <exception>
#include <fstream>
#include <functional>
#include <iomanip>
#include <ios>
#include <iosfwd>
#include <iostream>
#include <istream>
#include <iterator>
#include <limits>
#include <list>
#include <locale>
#include <map>
#include <memory>
#include <new>
#include <numeric>
#include <ostream>
#include <queue>
#include <set>
#include <sstream>
#include <stack>
#include <stdexcept>
#include <streambuf>
#include <string>
#include <typeinfo>
#include <utility>
#include <valarray>
#include <vector>
int main()
{
}
generates no warnings when compiled with -Weffc++, using gcc 3.4 or
3.5 20040502 .
That is, ITSM the pragma already solved the issue. Or I am
misunderstanding something.