This is the mail archive of the
mailing list for the GCC project.
Re: [PATCH] C++ space optimization: de-cloning con/de/structors,take IV
- From: Jason Merrill <jason at redhat dot com>
- To: Stuart Hastings <stuart at apple dot com>
- Cc: gcc-patches at gcc dot gnu dot org
- Date: Wed, 12 May 2004 16:29:41 -0400
- Subject: Re: [PATCH] C++ space optimization: de-cloning con/de/structors,take IV
- References: <email@example.com><0C52D318-A43E-11D8-B1F9-000A95A83B3C@apple.com><27E087C8-B634-11D6-96F9-003065ED8B66@apple.com><firstname.lastname@example.org><F6CC2699-A44E-11D8-B1F9-000A95A83B3C@apple.com>
On Wed, 12 May 2004 13:00:06 -0700, Stuart Hastings <email@example.com> wrote:
>> In my response to your third revision of the patch, I asked about making
>> the symbols both private and coalesced; obviously if we can't eliminate
>> duplicates that interferes with the space optimization. What's the
>> situation with the symbol names in the current Apple compiler? I thought
>> that the direction discussed at
>> seemed reasonable.
> I inquired with Matt Austern (in the adjacent office :-), and was told that
> nothing had been proposed to the ABI committee.
No, not yet. What does the current Apple compiler do?