This is the mail archive of the gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: [Paul Eggert <eggert@CS.UCLA.EDU>] PATCH: obstack.c, obstack.h port to AS/400 (for Bison and gnulib)

From: DJ Delorie <dj at redhat dot com>
To: gdr at integrable-solutions dot net
Cc: jsm at polyomino dot org dot uk, gcc-patches at gcc dot gnu dot org
Date: Mon, 10 May 2004 11:08:21 -0400
Subject: Re: [Paul Eggert <eggert@CS.UCLA.EDU>] PATCH: obstack.c, obstack.h port to AS/400 (for Bison and gnulib)
References: <m3zn8h2fgu.fsf@uniton.integrable-solutions.net><Pine.LNX.4.58.0405100912230.25000@digraph.polyomino.org.uk> <m3hduoflud.fsf@uniton.integrable-solutions.net>

> Now that GCC is requiring a C90 compiler, is there any other reason
> why libiberty can't assume similar compiler?

GCC is not the only project using libiberty.  Libiberty will be the
last to convert.

Follow-Ups:
- Re: [Paul Eggert <eggert@CS.UCLA.EDU>] PATCH: obstack.c, obstack.h port to AS/400 (for Bison and gnulib)
  - From: Daniel Jacobowitz
- Re: [Paul Eggert <eggert@CS.UCLA.EDU>] PATCH: obstack.c, obstack.h port to AS/400 (for Bison and gnulib)
  - From: Gabriel Dos Reis

References:
- [Paul Eggert <eggert@CS.UCLA.EDU>] PATCH: obstack.c, obstack.h port to AS/400 (for Bison and gnulib)
  - From: Gabriel Dos Reis
- Re: [Paul Eggert <eggert@CS.UCLA.EDU>] PATCH: obstack.c, obstack.hport to AS/400 (for Bison and gnulib)
  - From: Joseph S. Myers
- Re: [Paul Eggert <eggert@CS.UCLA.EDU>] PATCH: obstack.c, obstack.h port to AS/400 (for Bison and gnulib)
  - From: Gabriel Dos Reis

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]