This is the mail archive of the gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: PR/14899 patch ping^2

From: Paolo Bonzini <bonzini at gnu dot org>
To: Richard Henderson <rth at redhat dot com>
Cc: gcc-patches at gcc dot gnu dot org, Aldy Hernandez <aldyh at redhat dot com>
Date: Mon, 03 May 2004 19:48:17 +0200
Subject: Re: PR/14899 patch ping^2
References: <4093714A.6070002@gnu.org> <20040503020652.GA1362@redhat.com> <4095FC1E.9090809@gnu.org> <20040503162901.GA22195@redhat.com>

Have you proof this is necessary?  I see no reason why it should be.
To make an opaque type different from any other vector type, it should
be sufficient to ensure that it was created with a new base type.

It is not. It is created from V2SI_type_node :-/ in config/rs6000/rs6000.c; my template specialization testcase still fails without these two lines.

Paolo

Follow-Ups:
- Re: PR/14899 patch ping^2
  - From: Richard Henderson

References:
- PR/14899 patch ping^2
  - From: Paolo Bonzini
- Re: PR/14899 patch ping^2
  - From: Aldy Hernandez
- Re: PR/14899 patch ping^2
  - From: Paolo Bonzini
- Re: PR/14899 patch ping^2
  - From: Richard Henderson

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]