This is the mail archive of the
gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GCC project.
Re: longlong.h and the GMP team (PR 13873)
- From: Zack Weinberg <zack at codesourcery dot com>
- To: Mark Haigh <mhaigh at sonicwall dot com>
- Cc: gcc-patches at gcc dot gnu dot org, Mark Mitchell <mitchell at codesourcery dot com>
- Date: Fri, 16 Apr 2004 01:15:30 -0700
- Subject: Re: longlong.h and the GMP team (PR 13873)
- References: <385918F84B55DC4E9542E0A4812F4131769D04@us0exb01.us.sonicwall.com>
Mark Haigh <mhaigh@sonicwall.com> writes:
> Zack Weinberg wrote:
>
>> Mark Haigh <mhaigh@sonicwall.com> writes:
>>
>> > Hello again,
>> >
>> > For the past couple of weeks I've been trying to work with the GMP
>> > team to get longlong.h fixed so that all non-PPC vxWorks builds of
>> > both GMP and GCC compile properly. I've bent over backwards to try to
>> > work with them to get something that's acceptable to both GMP and GCC.
>> > I really have tried to be as accomidating as possible.
>>
>> Reading the GMP list, it seems to me that an accurate assessment of
>> their position is, they agree with your latest patch, they just can't
>> be bothered to roll it into their tree. From our end, our only
>> concern was to avoid divergence, on the assumption that GMP
>> maintainers were responsive to patches. Since they apparently aren't,
>> I think we could go ahead with your patch for GCC.
>>
>> Does anyone disagree?
>>
>> zw
>>
>
> Been a week or so, here's a link to the patch again (against 3.4):
>
> http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2004-03/msg00501.html
Go ahead and check this into mainline. You will need Mark Mitchell's
approval for 3.4.
zw