This is the mail archive of the
gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GCC project.
Fwd: more hot-cold partitioning problems
- From: Caroline Tice <ctice at apple dot com>
- To: "gcc-patches at gcc dot gnu dot org Patches" <gcc-patches at gcc dot gnu dot org>
- Date: Wed, 14 Apr 2004 11:13:41 -0700
- Subject: Fwd: more hot-cold partitioning problems
I forgot to add the list to my answer. Sorry.
Begin forwarded message:
From: Caroline Tice <ctice@apple.com>
Date: April 14, 2004 11:13:15 AM PDT
To: Daniel Jacobowitz <drow@false.org>
Subject: Re: more hot-cold partitioning problems
No, I do not believe there are any code differences. However Richard
appeared to be stating that adding the "-g" flag should not change whether
or not the program compiled or not, and I am pointing out that in this
case it did.
-- Caroline
On Apr 14, 2004, at 11:06 AM, Daniel Jacobowitz wrote:
On Wed, Apr 14, 2004 at 11:03:55AM -0700, Caroline Tice wrote:
Searching the zip.s file created from the run without "-g", there are
no symbols or labels in the file containing
"LFE", "LBE", or "Ltext".
That's not in dispute of Richard's points. Are there any differences
in the _code_? Those labels are used by the debug information.
--
Daniel Jacobowitz
MontaVista Software Debian GNU/Linux Developer