This is the mail archive of the gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: [RFC/PATCH]: transform builtin isdigit (okay with locales?)

From: DJ Delorie <dj at redhat dot com>
To: ghazi at caip dot rutgers dot edu
Cc: gcc-patches at gcc dot gnu dot org
Date: Mon, 12 Apr 2004 20:12:54 -0400
Subject: Re: [RFC/PATCH]: transform builtin isdigit (okay with locales?)
References: <200404082102.i38L2cCW006642@caip.rutgers.edu> <200404082118.i38LIvk2030324@greed.delorie.com> <200404121526.i3CFQjiW010448@caip.rutgers.edu> <200404121909.i3CJ9suE014021@greed.delorie.com> <200404130008.i3D08IfT013476@caip.rutgers.edu>

> It's not that improbable or hard to get the library function.
> E.g. in glibc, the ctype macros are not defined if __cplusplus is.
> So just use G++ on a glibc system (with no special flags) and you
> hit it.

Ah, didn't know that.

> (I can't think of any.)

Me neither, just being paranoid.

References:
- [RFC/PATCH]: transform builtin isdigit (okay with locales?)
  - From: Kaveh R. Ghazi
- Re: [RFC/PATCH]: transform builtin isdigit (okay with locales?)
  - From: DJ Delorie
- Re: [RFC/PATCH]: transform builtin isdigit (okay with locales?)
  - From: Kaveh R. Ghazi
- Re: [RFC/PATCH]: transform builtin isdigit (okay with locales?)
  - From: DJ Delorie
- Re: [RFC/PATCH]: transform builtin isdigit (okay with locales?)
  - From: Kaveh R. Ghazi

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]