This is the mail archive of the gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: [patch] XFAIL anew?.C

From: "Kaveh R. Ghazi" <ghazi at caip dot rutgers dot edu>
To: mark at codesourcery dot com
Cc: gcc-patches at gcc dot gnu dot org, paul at codesourcery dot com
Date: Sun, 11 Apr 2004 17:17:25 -0400 (EDT)
Subject: Re: [patch] XFAIL anew?.C
References: <200404052346.40750.paul@codesourcery.com> <200404091226.i39CQ8ug010701@caip.rutgers.edu> <4079A3C7.3010301@codesourcery.com>

 > From: Mark Mitchell <mark@codesourcery.com>
 > 
 > Yes, this is fine for 3.4.1.  In fact, it's fine for 3.4.0 if it
 > gets done quickly; removing spurious FAILs is a good thing for
 > users downloading the 3.4.0 release.

Under that principle, may I backport this testsuite patch?
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2004-04/msg00303.html

It's already tested and ready to install.

		Thanks,
		--Kaveh
--
Kaveh R. Ghazi			ghazi@caip.rutgers.edu

Follow-Ups:
- Re: [patch] XFAIL anew?.C
  - From: Mark Mitchell

References:
- [patch] XFAIL anew?.C
  - From: Paul Brook
- Re: [patch] XFAIL anew?.C
  - From: Kaveh R. Ghazi
- Re: [patch] XFAIL anew?.C
  - From: Mark Mitchell

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]