This is the mail archive of the gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: [PATCH]: Add some more builtins opts for sqrt/cbrt

From: "Kaveh R. Ghazi" <ghazi at caip dot rutgers dot edu>
To: rth at redhat dot com
Cc: dje at watson dot ibm dot com, gcc-patches at gcc dot gnu dot org, jh at suse dot cz, roger at eyesopen dot com
Date: Mon, 29 Mar 2004 18:21:58 -0500 (EST)
Subject: Re: [PATCH]: Add some more builtins opts for sqrt/cbrt
References: <200403121436.i2CEaTGY016703@caip.rutgers.edu> <200403271843.i2RIhaT34950@makai.watson.ibm.com> <200403280005.i2S05Wc9008386@caip.rutgers.edu> <20040329185515.GC17727@redhat.com> <200403292047.i2TKlHLf021144@caip.rutgers.edu> <20040329205224.GA18217@redhat.com>

 > From: Richard Henderson <rth@redhat.com>
 > 
 > On Mon, Mar 29, 2004 at 03:47:17PM -0500, Kaveh R. Ghazi wrote:
 > > If I understand it correctly, there's no guarantee that if you ask for
 > > a "long double" pow function that you'll actually get `powl'.
 > 
 > That's also a bug.  Why are we comparing modes as opposed
 > to type-main-variant or such?
 > r~

Don't know, let's ask the original author of the function.  Jan?

--
Kaveh R. Ghazi			ghazi@caip.rutgers.edu

References:
- [PATCH]: Add some more builtins opts for sqrt/cbrt
  - From: Kaveh R. Ghazi
- Re: [PATCH]: Add some more builtins opts for sqrt/cbrt
  - From: David Edelsohn
- Re: [PATCH]: Add some more builtins opts for sqrt/cbrt
  - From: Kaveh R. Ghazi
- Re: [PATCH]: Add some more builtins opts for sqrt/cbrt
  - From: Richard Henderson
- Re: [PATCH]: Add some more builtins opts for sqrt/cbrt
  - From: Kaveh R. Ghazi
- Re: [PATCH]: Add some more builtins opts for sqrt/cbrt
  - From: Richard Henderson

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]