This is the mail archive of the gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format: [Raw text]

Re: PATCH - [tree-ssa] regrouping of expression tree for single multiply add.


In message <D763C8B4-7EB9-11D8-8C7F-000A95D7CD40@apple.com>, Dale Johannesen wr
ites:
 >
 >On Mar 25, 2004, at 4:00 PM, law@redhat.com wrote:
 >
 >> In message <A2195074-7EB6-11D8-8C7F-000A95D7CD40@apple.com>, Dale 
 >> Johannesen wr
 >> ites:
 >>> Well, there's an argument against it, all right, but the view that 
 >>> it's
 >>> excellent
 >>> appears to be a minority one.  It's clear that quite a few people find
 >>> such
 >>> transformations useful.  Those of you who want standard-conforming
 >>> behavior
 >>> don't have to use -ffast-math, after all.
 >> OR, those who do not want standard conforming code probably ought to be
 >> using -ffast-math.  I *much* prefer to keep the compiler standards 
 >> conforming.
 >
 >I think there is general agreement on that (without -ffast-math).
 >But Fariborz's change is done only with flag_unsafe_math_optimizations.
Yes.  You're right.  I'm mentally dropping details again.  I'll shut-up
now :(
jeff



Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]