This is the mail archive of the gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: [PATCH] Updated patch to overhaul RTX classes

From: Paolo Bonzini <paolo dot bonzini at polimi dot it>
To: Diego Novillo <dnovillo at redhat dot com>
Cc: Zack Weinberg <zack at codesourcery dot com>, Bonzini <bonzini at gnu dot org>, "gcc-patches at gcc dot gnu dot org" <gcc-patches at gcc dot gnu dot org>, Richard Henderson <rth at redhat dot com>
Date: Tue, 02 Mar 2004 17:53:05 +0100
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Updated patch to overhaul RTX classes
References: <20040301125548.GA30641@fencepost> <87ishnpq9y.fsf@egil.codesourcery.com> <1078231683.17431.196.camel@localhost.localdomain>
Reply-to: bonzini at gnu dot org

Paolo, could you try applying it to the branch as well?

I tried applying the current patch on the current treessa branch, the only conflicts were in bits of HEAD that have not yet been merged. So far a C only bootstrap is in stage3 -- even without comparison and regtesting, that's (very) encouraging to me. I think that delaying the application to mainline to right after the next mainline -> tree-ssa branch will be good enough, and I suspect that the revision process alone will gracefully take care of the delay. :-)

Paolo

Follow-Ups:
- Re: [PATCH] Updated patch to overhaul RTX classes
  - From: Diego Novillo

References:
- [PATCH] Updated patch to overhaul RTX classes
  - From: Bonzini
- Re: [PATCH] Updated patch to overhaul RTX classes
  - From: Zack Weinberg
- Re: [PATCH] Updated patch to overhaul RTX classes
  - From: Diego Novillo

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]