This is the mail archive of the gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format: [Raw text]

Re: [tree-ssa, RFC] Non-gimple conversions produced by inliner


In message <20031213142938.GE3631@kam.mff.cuni.cz>, Jan Hubicka writes:
 >Hi,
 >inliner a = (type1)(type2)b during libjava build.  According to my
 >verifier this is not valid gimple, but is_gimple_rhs on rhs is happy
 >because it does not check operands.
 >What is the proper fix?  The patch bellow adds more checking into
 >inliner and it should catch all cases where we lose, but it is not
 >elegant at all.
 >
 >Ideas?
 >Honza
 >
 >2003-12-13  Jan Hubicka  <jh@suse.cz>
 >	* tree-inline.c (expand_call_inline):  Do more strict gimple checking.
I just installed some code to deal with this problem.  

jeff



Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]