This is the mail archive of the gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: stderr vs. STDERR_FILENO

From: kaih at khms dot westfalen dot de (Kai Henningsen)
To: gcc-patches at gcc dot gnu dot org
Date: 26 Feb 2004 08:27:00 +0200
Subject: Re: stderr vs. STDERR_FILENO
Comment: Unsolicited commercial mail will incur an US$100 handling fee per received mail.
Organization: Organisation? Me?! Are you kidding?
References: <403B784E.6070508@codesourcery.com> <403BB934.7040604@codesourcery.com> <jeu11gf4cm.fsf@sykes.suse.de> <jeu11gf4cm.fsf@sykes.suse.de> <403BE162.9040202@codesourcery.com>

mark@codesourcery.com (Mark Mitchell)  wrote on 24.02.04 in <403BE162.9040202@codesourcery.com>:

> There are three cases:
>
> (1) stderr open and attached to fd 2
>
> (2) stderr freopen'd (and not attached to fd 2)
>
> (3) stderr fclose'd

The third, however, is one where I feel the user deserves whatever he  
gets. There is no good reason to do this.

MfG Kai

References:
- stderr vs. STDERR_FILENO
  - From: Mark Mitchell
- Re: stderr vs. STDERR_FILENO
  - From: Mark Mitchell
- Re: stderr vs. STDERR_FILENO
  - From: Andreas Schwab
- Re: stderr vs. STDERR_FILENO
  - From: Mark Mitchell

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]