This is the mail archive of the
mailing list for the GCC project.
Re: analysis of libiberty/cp-demangle.c for libsupc++/__cxa_demangle
- From: Carlo Wood <carlo at alinoe dot com>
- To: Ian Lance Taylor <ian at wasabisystems dot com>
- Cc: Zack Weinberg <zack at codesourcery dot com>, libstdc++ at gcc dot gnu dot org, gcc-patches at gcc dot gnu dot org, Mark Mitchell <mark at codesourcery dot com>, Benjamin Kosnik <bkoz at redhat dot com>
- Date: Wed, 25 Feb 2004 15:56:11 +0100
- Subject: Re: analysis of libiberty/cp-demangle.c for libsupc++/__cxa_demangle
- References: <firstname.lastname@example.org> <email@example.com> <403AAA1B.firstname.lastname@example.org> <email@example.com> <403AAE14.firstname.lastname@example.org> <email@example.com> <20040225063825.GA21326@disaster.jaj.com> <firstname.lastname@example.org> <email@example.com>
On Wed, Feb 25, 2004 at 09:00:07AM -0500, Ian Lance Taylor wrote:
> "Zack Weinberg" <firstname.lastname@example.org> writes:
> > > I don't think anybody had proposed actually removing the Wood/C++
> > > demangler. Did I miss an email?
> > The only reason I've seen for keeping it is the user-selectable
> > allocator capability. Has Ian now added that to the libiberty
> > demangler?
> No, not yet.
I am not not even CC-ed in this discussion.
Thanks for the "nice" times at gcc, I am out of here.
I will not do anything ever again for the FSF or libstdc++ in
particularly. And Ian, if you just-like-that without any
discussion or approval start to remove my code - then make
sure you get my copyright assignment undone too! I want my
code back - completely.
Carlo Wood <email@example.com>