This is the mail archive of the
gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GCC project.
Re: analysis of libiberty/cp-demangle.c for libsupc++/__cxa_demangle
- From: Gabriel Dos Reis <gdr at integrable-solutions dot net>
- To: libstdc++ at gcc dot gnu dot org
- Cc: gcc-patches at gcc dot gnu dot org, Ian Lance Taylor <ian at wasabisystems dot com>, Mark Mitchell <mark at codesourcery dot com>, Benjamin Kosnik <bkoz at redhat dot com>
- Date: 25 Feb 2004 13:46:35 +0100
- Subject: Re: analysis of libiberty/cp-demangle.c for libsupc++/__cxa_demangle
- Organization: Integrable Solutions
- References: <20040223170416.7a0ab854.bkoz@redhat.com><m3wu6dgtqe.fsf@gossamer.airs.com> <403AAA1B.2040308@codesourcery.com><m3hdxhgskw.fsf@gossamer.airs.com> <403AAE14.1060400@codesourcery.com><m365dv3ehp.fsf@gossamer.airs.com><20040225063825.GA21326@disaster.jaj.com>
Phil Edwards <phil@codesourcery.com> writes:
| On Wed, Feb 25, 2004 at 12:38:42AM -0500, Ian Lance Taylor wrote:
| >
| > Here is a patch for the 3.4 branch. This patch includes fixes to the
| > libiberty demangler, Benjamin's patches to libstdc++-v3 to use the
| > libiberty demangler rather than the libstdc++-v3 demangler, and
| > patches to the libstdc++-v3 testsuite so that it passes.
| >
| > The appended patch does not include the diffs to the generated files,
| > nor does it include the two removed files.
|
| I don't think anybody had proposed actually removing the Wood/C++
| demangler. Did I miss an email?
Same here.
-- Gaby