This is the mail archive of the gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: [3.3 PATCH] Fix C++ ICE on designated initializer (regressionfrom 3.2.x)

From: Jason Merrill <jason at redhat dot com>
To: Jakub Jelinek <jakub at redhat dot com>
Cc: Gabriel Dos Reis <gdr at integrable-solutions dot net>, gcc-patches at gcc dot gnu dot org
Date: Wed, 18 Feb 2004 17:10:13 -0500
Subject: Re: [3.3 PATCH] Fix C++ ICE on designated initializer (regressionfrom 3.2.x)
References: <20040217121213.GI4581@sunsite.ms.mff.cuni.cz><xyp7jylveza.fsf@miranda.boston.redhat.com><20040217164629.GJ31589@devserv.devel.redhat.com>

On Tue, 17 Feb 2004 11:46:29 -0500, Jakub Jelinek <jakub@redhat.com> wrote:

> On Tue, Feb 17, 2004 at 11:38:01AM -0500, Jason Merrill wrote:
>> Is this not needed for 3.4/trunk?
>
> No, the new parser doesn't recognize any form of designated initializers
> (neither the old GNU style, nor the ISO C99 ones).

Hmm, that sounds like a regression.

Jason

Follow-Ups:
- Re: [3.3 PATCH] Fix C++ ICE on designated initializer (regression from 3.2.x)
  - From: Jakub Jelinek

References:
- [3.3 PATCH] Fix C++ ICE on designated initializer (regression from 3.2.x)
  - From: Jakub Jelinek
- Re: [3.3 PATCH] Fix C++ ICE on designated initializer (regressionfrom 3.2.x)
  - From: Jason Merrill
- Re: [3.3 PATCH] Fix C++ ICE on designated initializer (regression from 3.2.x)
  - From: Jakub Jelinek

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]