This is the mail archive of the
mailing list for the GCC project.
Re: [PATCH] Segfault in rtx_varies_p
Paul Brook wrote:
It is a regression from 3.3. On 3.3 we don't recognize (symbol_ref "digs") as
a constant so CSE decides it isn't worth trying to substitute the problematic
equality for (reg 101). It may be possible to construct testcases which
trigger similar failures on 3.3, but I can't find any.Yes, thanks!
Ok for 3.4 given this?