This is the mail archive of the gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: [PATCH] RFC/RFA fix exec-charset problems - take 2

From: Eric Christopher <echristo at redhat dot com>
To: "Joseph S. Myers" <jsm at polyomino dot org dot uk>
Cc: gcc-patches at gcc dot gnu dot org, mark at codesourcery dot com
Date: Wed, 18 Feb 2004 08:50:10 -0800
Subject: Re: [PATCH] RFC/RFA fix exec-charset problems - take 2
References: <1077067318.17315.26.camel@dzur.sfbay.redhat.com> <Pine.LNX.4.58.0402181117040.31526@digraph.polyomino.org.uk>

On Wed, 2004-02-18 at 03:19, Joseph S. Myers wrote:
> On Tue, 17 Feb 2004, Eric Christopher wrote:
> 
> > Mark: If this is, again, not acceptable for 3.4 then I'll submit a patch
> > to turn off the option on the branch as it isn't useful without it.
> 
> I don't see why the option isn't useful on the branch as is.  Doesn't it
> work OK for the common case where both charsets are ASCII-compatible (e.g.
> UTF-8, ISO-8859-1, ...) and strings in the problematic places (asms,
> attributes) are ASCII-only?

I suppose we can put a note to that effect if you think the translation
is useful - I didn't.

-eric

-- 
Eric Christopher <echristo@redhat.com>

References:
- [PATCH] RFC/RFA fix exec-charset problems - take 2
  - From: Eric Christopher
- Re: [PATCH] RFC/RFA fix exec-charset problems - take 2
  - From: Joseph S. Myers

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]