This is the mail archive of the gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: [mainline/tree-profiling] Fix find_sub_basic_blocks lazyness

From: Richard Henderson <rth at redhat dot com>
To: Jan Hubicka <hubicka at ucw dot cz>
Cc: Jan Hubicka <jh at suse dot cz>, gcc-patches at gcc dot gnu dot org
Date: Tue, 17 Feb 2004 10:43:44 -0800
Subject: Re: [mainline/tree-profiling] Fix find_sub_basic_blocks lazyness
References: <20040216162451.GH7632@kam.mff.cuni.cz> <20040216193115.GD7931@redhat.com> <20040216223945.GO7632@kam.mff.cuni.cz> <20040216232632.GB9446@redhat.com> <20040217065529.GI26227@atrey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz>

On Tue, Feb 17, 2004 at 07:55:29AM +0100, Jan Hubicka wrote:
> OK, I am not quite sure what the representation shall be.  I can make it
> a pary of (return) and the unspec or just jump insn with the unspec...

Just the unspec.  We don't "return" as in edge-to-exit after all.


r~

References:
- [mainline/tree-profiling] Fix find_sub_basic_blocks lazyness
  - From: Jan Hubicka
- Re: [mainline/tree-profiling] Fix find_sub_basic_blocks lazyness
  - From: Richard Henderson
- Re: [mainline/tree-profiling] Fix find_sub_basic_blocks lazyness
  - From: Jan Hubicka
- Re: [mainline/tree-profiling] Fix find_sub_basic_blocks lazyness
  - From: Richard Henderson
- Re: [mainline/tree-profiling] Fix find_sub_basic_blocks lazyness
  - From: Jan Hubicka

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]