This is the mail archive of the
gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GCC project.
Re: [patch] lno branch merge -- new iv & simple loop analysis
Hello,
> > I have added check for this to iv_number_of_iterations and abort
> > to get_mode_bounds; there are several places where I rely on that
> > the returned value is a const_int, so I would rather postpone handling
> > it till it shows up to be a problem.
>
> I would expect
>
> long long i, n;
> for (i = 0; i < n; ++i)
>
> to abort on i386 then, since HOST_BITS_PER_WIDE_INT == 32.
> You're going to have to have some way to quit early if the
> mode doesn't fit your expectations.
as I stated, I have added this check to iv_number_of_iterations.
Zdenek
> Unless you have a Really Good Reason, I think all of your
> uses of HOST_WIDEST_INT are wrong.
>
>
> r~