This is the mail archive of the gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: PATCH for java/nio buffers

From: Michael Koch <konqueror at gmx dot de>
To: Per Bothner <per at bothner dot com>
Cc: gcc-patches at gcc dot gnu dot org, java-patches at gcc dot gnu dot org
Date: Fri, 13 Feb 2004 18:13:48 +0100
Subject: Re: PATCH for java/nio buffers
References: <402C1489.1070806@bothner.com> <20040213085050.GA26927@mail.konqueror.de> <402CF9A3.4000806@bothner.com> <20040213165455.GA30302@mail.konqueror.de> <402D0362.7030705@bothner.com>

On Fri, Feb 13, 2004 at 09:03:30AM -0800, Per Bothner wrote:
> Michael Koch wrote:
> 
> >Wouldnt it be enough to make the default constructor package-private ?
> 
> Then users wouldn't be able to extend those classes.  And I think
> the spec allows them to (though I can't imagine many users doing so).

I'm unhappy with this because japitools will complain that our API is
different.


Michael

Follow-Ups:
- Re: PATCH for java/nio buffers
  - From: Per Bothner

References:
- PATCH for java/nio buffers
  - From: Per Bothner
- Re: PATCH for java/nio buffers
  - From: Michael Koch
- Re: PATCH for java/nio buffers
  - From: Per Bothner
- Re: PATCH for java/nio buffers
  - From: Michael Koch
- Re: PATCH for java/nio buffers
  - From: Per Bothner

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]