This is the mail archive of the
mailing list for the GCC project.
Re: [PATCH] gen-classpath-compare
- From: Gerald Pfeifer <gp at suse dot de>
- To: Michael Koch <konqueror at gmx dot de>
- Cc: gcc-patches at gcc dot gnu dot org, java-patches at gcc dot gnu dot org
- Date: Fri, 13 Feb 2004 10:29:27 +0100 (CET)
- Subject: Re: [PATCH] gen-classpath-compare
- References: <email@example.com> <Pine.LNX.4.58.0401141724290.5024@D209.suse.de><20040114192822.GA20131@mail.konqueror.de> <Pine.LNX.firstname.lastname@example.org><20040121210438.GB4341@mail.konqueror.de> <Pine.LNX.email@example.com><20040122145410.GA15651@mail.konqueror.de>
On Thu, 22 Jan 2004, Michael Koch wrote:
>> ? And which colors should I initially assign to these?
> We really have no preferences for the colors. My proposal would be would
> be to make merged and specific classes (1-4) green, merged classes
> (6 + 7) orange or yellow and unmerged classes (5) red. It would probably
> be nice to have unique color for every type to distinguish easier. I
> dont know if thats possible with green for 5 types.
I just committed a first proposal for a global GCC style sheet (which,
for now, only contains styles for what we've been talking about)?
My rationale was that VM-specific and GCJ-specific are "neutral", so I
put them in blue, unlike merged which is truely positive (green).
Wrt. the first two in your list, aren't these types where, at one point,
we might expect to merge them at some point, and thus should give them
Please find an example page below, which shows how to use the new styles
and import the global style sheet.
<link rel="stylesheet" type="text/css" href="http://gcc.gnu.org/gcc.css">