This is the mail archive of the gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: RFC/PATCH: c-decl.c: no getdecls() for you

From: David Edelsohn <dje at watson dot ibm dot com>
To: "Zack Weinberg" <zack at codesourcery dot com>
Cc: gcc-patches at gcc dot gnu dot org, Daniel Jacobowitz <drow at false dot org>, Rainer Orth <ro at TechFak dot Uni-Bielefeld dot DE>
Date: Tue, 10 Feb 2004 17:59:11 -0500
Subject: Re: RFC/PATCH: c-decl.c: no getdecls() for you
References: <87oes9b0y5.fsf@egil.codesourcery.com> <200402100612.i1A6C6T32338@makai.watson.ibm.com> <874qtzzb01.fsf@egil.codesourcery.com>

	GCC 3.4 with the patch built and I posted the regression test
results:

http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-testresults/2004-02/msg00493.html

I do not have the GDB testsuite to run.

	While the patch now seems to work, I cannot tell how this affected
debugging information on AIX.  This seems like a very invasive patch to
apply so late in the development cycle of the release branch.

David

Follow-Ups:
- Re: RFC/PATCH: c-decl.c: no getdecls() for you
  - From: Zack Weinberg

References:
- RFC/PATCH: c-decl.c: no getdecls() for you
  - From: Zack Weinberg
- Re: RFC/PATCH: c-decl.c: no getdecls() for you
  - From: David Edelsohn
- Re: RFC/PATCH: c-decl.c: no getdecls() for you
  - From: Zack Weinberg

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]