This is the mail archive of the gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: Enable -fomit-frame-pointer on i386

From: Jakub Jelinek <jakub at redhat dot com>
To: Jeff Sturm <jsturm at one-point dot com>
Cc: Jan Hubicka <jh at suse dot cz>, gcc-patches at gcc dot gnu dot org, rth at redhat dot com
Date: Mon, 9 Feb 2004 12:53:53 -0500
Subject: Re: Enable -fomit-frame-pointer on i386
References: <20040207234350.GE23464@kam.mff.cuni.cz> <Pine.LNX.4.44.0402071857480.18757-100000@ops2.one-point.com>
Reply-to: Jakub Jelinek <jakub at redhat dot com>

On Sat, Feb 07, 2004 at 07:01:19PM -0500, Jeff Sturm wrote:
> On Sun, 8 Feb 2004, Jan Hubicka wrote:
> > 2004-02-08  Jan Hubicka  <jh@suse.cz>
> > 	* i386.c (override_options): Enable -fomit-frame-pointer and
> > 	-fasynchronous-unwind-tables by default on i386.
> 
> Hmm... am I correct in thinking that backtrace() from glibc will not work
> with -fomit-frame-pointer?  That may be a problem for libjava.

See http://sources.redhat.com/ml/libc-hacker/2003-12/msg00054.html

	Jakub

References:
- Enable -fomit-frame-pointer on i386
  - From: Jan Hubicka
- Re: Enable -fomit-frame-pointer on i386
  - From: Jeff Sturm

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]