This is the mail archive of the
mailing list for the GCC project.
Re: C++ PATCH: PR 13714
Bernardo Innocenti <email@example.com> writes:
| Mark Mitchell wrote:
| > ! error ("the type being destroyed is '%T', but the destructor refers to `%T'",
| > ! TYPE_MAIN_VARIANT (object_type), dtor_type);
| Shouldn't we use a backtick before the first %T?
No. We've discussed this in the past. As I recalled it, the
conclusion was moving toward the form he used.
(something that would be better is a marker that could be suitable for