Re: --enable-version-specific-runtime-libs fix

[Geoff Keating <geoffk at geoffk dot org>]

"Joseph S. Myers" <jsm@polyomino.org.uk> writes:

> On Thu, 5 Feb 2004, Geoffrey Keating wrote:
> 
> > There are a few obscure places where the former gcc-lib was being
> > referenced.  This fixes them.
> > 
> > Tested by installing a built tree with
> > --enable-version-specific-runtime-libs on powerpc-darwin and checking
> > that a simple C++ program still links.
> 
> What about the distinction between libsubdir (under libdir) and
> libexecsubdir (under libexecdir), as I noted in response to a previous
> proposed patch for this issue
> <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2004-01/msg01696.html>?

See:

   # Need the gcc compiler version to know where to install libraries
   # and header files if --enable-version-specific-runtime-libs option
-  # is selected.
+  # is selected.  FIXME: "toolexecdir" is a misnomer, there are no
+  # executables installed there.

-- 
- Geoffrey Keating <geoffk@geoffk.org>