This is the mail archive of the
gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GCC project.
[patch] config: Replace gen_rtx with gen_rtx_{FOO,fmt_e*}.
- From: Kazu Hirata <kazu at cs dot umass dot edu>
- To: gcc-patches at gcc dot gnu dot org
- Date: Tue, 03 Feb 2004 02:09:25 -0500 (EST)
- Subject: [patch] config: Replace gen_rtx with gen_rtx_{FOO,fmt_e*}.
Hi,
With this patch, there is no occurrence of gen_rtx other than in
comments and obsolete ports. My plan is to remove gen_rtx as soon as
those obsolete ports are gone.
Built c4x-elf and ip2k-elf. Committed as obvious.
Kazu Hirata
2004-02-03 Kazu Hirata <kazu@cs.umass.edu>
* config/c4x/c4x.h (FUNCTION_VALUE): Use gen_rtx_REG instead
of gen_rtx.
(LIBCALL_VALUE): Likewise.
* config/ip2k/ip2k.c (mdr_try_propagate_clr_sequence): Use
gen_rtx_CC0 instead of gen_rtx.
* config/m68hc11/m68hc11.c (m68hc11_emit_libcall): Use
gen_rtx_fmt_e and gen_rtx_fmt_ee instead of gen_rtx.
(m68hc11_expand_compare): Use gen_rtx_fmt_ee instead of
gen_rtx.
(m68hc11_emit_logical): Likewise.
Index: c4x/c4x.h
===================================================================
RCS file: /cvs/gcc/gcc/gcc/config/c4x/c4x.h,v
retrieving revision 1.141
diff -u -p -r1.141 c4x.h
--- c4x/c4x.h 1 Feb 2004 21:21:35 -0000 1.141
+++ c4x/c4x.h 3 Feb 2004 07:02:40 -0000
@@ -1151,10 +1151,10 @@ CUMULATIVE_ARGS;
/* How Scalar Function Values Are Returned. */
#define FUNCTION_VALUE(VALTYPE, FUNC) \
- gen_rtx(REG, TYPE_MODE(VALTYPE), R0_REGNO) /* Return in R0. */
+ gen_rtx_REG (TYPE_MODE(VALTYPE), R0_REGNO) /* Return in R0. */
#define LIBCALL_VALUE(MODE) \
- gen_rtx(REG, MODE, R0_REGNO) /* Return in R0. */
+ gen_rtx_REG (MODE, R0_REGNO) /* Return in R0. */
#define FUNCTION_VALUE_REGNO_P(REGNO) ((REGNO) == R0_REGNO)
Index: ip2k/ip2k.c
===================================================================
RCS file: /cvs/gcc/gcc/gcc/config/ip2k/ip2k.c,v
retrieving revision 1.32
diff -u -p -r1.32 ip2k.c
--- ip2k/ip2k.c 1 Feb 2004 21:21:36 -0000 1.32
+++ ip2k/ip2k.c 3 Feb 2004 07:02:42 -0000
@@ -4458,7 +4458,7 @@ mdr_try_propagate_clr_sequence (first_in
&& GET_MODE_SIZE (GET_MODE (XEXP (set2, 1))) == 2
&& REGNO (XEXP (set2, 1)) == regno)
{
- new_insn = gen_rtx_SET (VOIDmode, gen_rtx (CC0, VOIDmode),
+ new_insn = gen_rtx_SET (VOIDmode, gen_rtx_CC0 (VOIDmode),
gen_rtx_REG(QImode, regno + 1));
new_insn = emit_insn_before (new_insn, try_insn);
}
Index: m68hc11/m68hc11.c
===================================================================
RCS file: /cvs/gcc/gcc/gcc/config/m68hc11/m68hc11.c,v
retrieving revision 1.95
diff -u -p -r1.95 m68hc11.c
--- m68hc11/m68hc11.c 3 Feb 2004 06:43:48 -0000 1.95
+++ m68hc11/m68hc11.c 3 Feb 2004 07:02:44 -0000
@@ -866,7 +866,7 @@ m68hc11_emit_libcall (const char *name,
case 2:
ret = emit_library_call_value (libcall, NULL_RTX, LCT_CONST,
dmode, 1, operands[1], smode);
- equiv = gen_rtx (code, dmode, operands[1]);
+ equiv = gen_rtx_fmt_e (code, dmode, operands[1]);
break;
case 3:
@@ -874,7 +874,7 @@ m68hc11_emit_libcall (const char *name,
LCT_CONST, dmode, 2,
operands[1], smode, operands[2],
smode);
- equiv = gen_rtx (code, dmode, operands[1], operands[2]);
+ equiv = gen_rtx_fmt_ee (code, dmode, operands[1], operands[2]);
break;
default:
@@ -2498,7 +2498,7 @@ m68hc11_expand_compare (enum rtx_code co
{
emit_insn (gen_rtx_SET (VOIDmode, cc0_rtx,
gen_rtx_COMPARE (VOIDmode, op0, op1)));
- ret = gen_rtx (code, VOIDmode, cc0_rtx, const0_rtx);
+ ret = gen_rtx_fmt_ee (code, VOIDmode, cc0_rtx, const0_rtx);
}
return ret;
@@ -2976,17 +2976,18 @@ m68hc11_emit_logical (enum machine_mode
{
emit_move_insn (operands[3], operands[1]);
emit_insn (gen_rtx_SET (mode,
- operands[3],
- gen_rtx (code, mode,
- operands[3], operands[2])));
+ operands[3],
+ gen_rtx_fmt_ee (code, mode,
+ operands[3], operands[2])));
insn = emit_move_insn (operands[0], operands[3]);
}
else
{
insn = emit_insn (gen_rtx_SET (mode,
- operands[0],
- gen_rtx (code, mode,
- operands[0], operands[2])));
+ operands[0],
+ gen_rtx_fmt_ee (code, mode,
+ operands[0],
+ operands[2])));
}
}