This is the mail archive of the gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.
Index Nav: | [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index] | |
---|---|---|
Message Nav: | [Date Prev] [Date Next] | [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] |
Other format: | [Raw text] |
bonzini <paolo.bonzini@polimi.it> writes: > + for (;;) > + { > switch (GET_CODE (x)) > { > + case STRICT_LOW_PART: > + case ZERO_EXTRACT: > + case SIGN_EXTRACT: > + /* Overly conservative. */ > + x = XEXP (x, 0); > + continue; > + > case SUBREG: > regno = REGNO (SUBREG_REG (x)); > if (regno < FIRST_PSEUDO_REGISTER) > @@ -1578,10 +1583,14 @@ > } > > default: > - break; > +#ifdef ENABLE_CHECKING > + if (CONSTANT_P (x)) > +#endif > + return 0; > } > > abort (); > + } This looks strange. Why do you add the for (;;) ? I don't see a reason for this... Andreas -- Andreas Jaeger, aj@suse.de, http://www.suse.de/~aj SuSE Linux AG, Maxfeldstr. 5, 90409 Nürnberg, Germany GPG fingerprint = 93A3 365E CE47 B889 DF7F FED1 389A 563C C272 A126
Attachment:
pgp00000.pgp
Description: PGP signature
Index Nav: | [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index] | |
---|---|---|
Message Nav: | [Date Prev] [Date Next] | [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] |