This is the mail archive of the gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format: [Raw text]

Re: PR 13722 candidate fix


On Tue, Jan 27, 2004 at 09:29:01AM +0100, Arnaud Charlet wrote:
> Given the numerous bugs opened or discussed regularly about various
> problems with parallel bootstrap for various reasons, I don't see that
> Ada is much different here.

Parallel bootstrap is a red herring.

[ But as point of fact, it works virtually all of the time.  There are
  enough folks now with MP systems that bugs here get fixed quickly.  
  I personally bootstrap on 4 and 8-way systems every day.  ]

The real point is that the ada tools do not get built with "make all"
or "make bootstrap".  Failure to build the tools means that they don't
get installed.  Failure to install the tools means that you wind up
using the new gnat1 with the original gnatbind.  Which results in a
version mismatch error, and the *second* compiler build fails.

> I personally don't care until there's a properly filed PR in bugzilla :-)

If 5910 isn't good enough for you, I'll happily file another.

[ Personally, I think marking 5910 as a dup of 5911 is wrong.  The two
  PRs raise two different problems.  That they may well be solved by
  the same source code rearrangement is immaterial.  ]

> You might even find out that what you are complaining about no longer is
> an issue (that's the advantage of having a PR in bugzilla, you can watch
> progress on thee issues).

I'm quite certain it's still a problem.  But if it makes you happy,
I'll file a PR including the entire build log.


r~


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]