This is the mail archive of the
gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GCC project.
Re: <addr_expr <realpart_expr <x>>> ?
Richard Henderson <rth@redhat.com> writes:
| On Sun, Jan 11, 2004 at 03:47:17AM +0100, Gabriel Dos Reis wrote:
| > No, it is standard.
| >
| > [#13] Each complex type has the same representation and
| > alignment requirements as an array type containing exactly
| > two elements of the corresponding real type; the first
| > element is equal to the real part, and the second element to
| > the imaginary part, of the complex number.
|
| Well, whatever. Anyway, it's still irrelevant because taking
| the address of a variable will also cause it not to be SSA renamed.
I can understand the technical part, but I don't see where you want to
get to.
To put __real__ z on the left hand side, we need an lvalue --
irrespective of implementation details.
-- Gaby